Betsy Ross Flag 2

  VS 

 

The Betsy Ross Flag versus the Stars and Bars of the Confederacy

Do not confuse the Betsy Ross Flag with the Stars and Bars of the Confederacy.  Since half the US population is below Median Intelligence with regard to the other half, as I pointed out in my first post concerning the Betsy Ross Flag, it is entirely possible that they would confuse the two.  To call the Betsy Ross Flag a Symbol of Racism or Slavery is undeniably Ignorant, but to call the Stars and Bars of the Confederacy such things is understandable.

The Betsy Ross Flag was the Symbol of a New Nation founded on the Pursuit of Freedom and the Unalienable Rights of All Mankind, while the Stars and Bars of the Confederacy was the Flag of the Slave States after they seceded from that Nation in an attempt to Suppress the Unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Perhaps, ignorant people can’t tell the difference.

 

FYI:

The Stars and Bars of the Confederacy existed in 4 different versions from 1861 to 1863: 7 stars, 9 stars, 11 stars, and finally, 13 stars.  In 1863, the Confederacy switched to a completely different design (one with a 13 starred saltire), precisely, because the Stars and Bars resembled the Union Flag.

The states represented by the stars on the Stars and Bars are NOT the same states represented by the stars on the Betsy Ross Flag.

During the Civil War, the Union Flag had 33, 34, and finally 35 stars.

 

 

Abortion and Slavery are both Evil

 

Abortion and Slavery are both Evil

Abortion and Slavery are both Evil, but Abortion is more Evil than Slavery: Abortion is the greatest Evil of them all.

It is the Epitome of Hypocrisy to condemn Slavery and not Abortion.  Anyone who condemns Slavery but not Abortion is ultimately Evil because Hypocrisy is ultimately Evil.

The Proto Criteria condemns both Abortion and Slavery, but Socialism does not.

“Conservatives” condemn both Abortion and Slavery but “Liberals” do not.

Republicans condemn both Abortion and Slavery but Democrats do not.

No Government or Political Platform is Righteous if it condones Abortion.  In other words, any Government or Political Platform that condones Abortion is Evil.

Abortion is the Greatest Sin America has ever committed.  We inherited Slavery from the British, but we legalized Abortion all by ourselves.

However, when I look at the American Flag, I don’t see a symbol of Abortion.  When I look at the American Flag, I don’t see a symbol of Slavery.

When I look at the American Flag, I see a symbol of the Proto Criteria – the Unalienable Rights of all Mankind.  I see Hope for the whole Human Race.

The time has come to end the Tyranny of Abortion just like we did Slavery.

 

 

The Betsy Ross Flag

 

The Betsy Ross Flag is a Symbol of Freedom, not Slavery

It is an incontrovertible FACT that half the population of the United States is below Median Intelligence in relation to the whole – it’s the way medians work.  A majority portion of that half actually believes they possess above median intelligence; it’s what they do.  It is also that half which is susceptible to the Malicious Idea that the United States was founded upon Slavery and that the Betsy Ross Flag is a Symbol of that Slavery.  They’re Intellectually Vapid and Analytically Incompetent.

Slavery was brought to the shores of this continent, not by the US Founding Fathers, but by the Tyrannical dictates of European Monarchies; people who were cut from the same Hivist Cloth that Socialists and Fascists are today.

The United States was not founded upon any desire to perpetuate Slavery, far from it.  In fact, the very moment the Declaration of Independence was penned and signed it began the End of Slavery.

You see, life was very different for people in the 18th and 19th centuries; it was extremely challenging just to stay alive in the New World.  People didn’t have the time to worry about what other people were doing far away, they had enough to worry about right where they were.  Colonists in New England didn’t have much in common with people in South Carolina except that they both spoke English and were governed by the British Crown.  You must remember that the Colonies were quasi-independent countries, there was no United States; it did not exist.  There was no President, no Congress, and no Supreme Court; no Federal Government, no Constitution, and no Flag.  Laws made in Georgia did not pertain to the people of New York, and laws made in Massachusetts didn’t apply to the people of North Carolina.  The only Common Government the Colonies referred to was the one in London.

Slavery in the Colonies only existed because the Monarchs of Great Britain allowed it to exist – they could have ended it anytime they wanted, but they didn’t.  Therefore, blame for the existence of Slavery in North America belongs at the feet of British Royalty, not the US Founding Fathers.

The Idea that gave birth to the United States of America was inspired by the acknowledgment of the Proto Criteria; the Realization that Human Beings are endowed by their Creator with the Unalienable Rights of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.  Slavery was in place long before the Government of the United States ever came into being.  The United States inherited Slavery from European Dictatorships, we did not create it, and we were left to purge it from Ourselves.    

England didn’t tell us to abolish Slavery.  Spain didn’t tell us to abolish Slavery.  France didn’t tell us to abolish Slavery.  There was no outcry from Europe for us to abolish Slavery, there wasn’t even an outcry from Africa.  The call to abolish Slavery came from within, from our own People.  The Citizens of the United States demanded that we abolish Slavery.  The Proto Criteria demanded that we abolish Slavery.  The Spirit of Freedom which drove our Founding demanded that we abolish Slavery… and WE DID, WE DID IT OURSELVES!

The English didn’t free the Slaves.  The Spanish didn’t free the Slaves.  The French didn’t free the Slaves.  Africans didn’t free the Slaves.  Marxists didn’t free the Slaves.  Communists didn’t free the Slaves.  Socialists didn’t free the Slaves.  Liberals didn’t free the Slaves.  And, sure as hell, the Democrat Party didn’t free the Slaves.  Union Soldiers and the Resolve of Millions of Americans, filled with the Spirit of the Proto Criteria, freed the Slaves.  The American Idea freed the Slaves.  It wasn’t easy, it wasn’t quick, but it was sure.

Slavery only existed in the United States for 87 years, from 1776 to 1865, what happened before that was under the jurisdiction of Great Britain.  That is why Abraham Lincoln said, “Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a NEW NATION, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.”  Before July 4th, 1776, Slavery was the responsibility of the Government of England.

Therefore, it is the epitome of ignorance to believe the Flag of the United States, particularly the Betsy Ross Flag, is a Symbol of Slavery.  Such a notion is Abject Stupidity and an Egregious Error, if not an outright Lie.

The Betsy Ross Flag, and the Flag of the United States in general, is the Symbol of Freedom, not Slavery.  It is the Symbol of the New Era of the Unalienable Rights of Mankind.

 

Beware of “Angels of Light” and “Wolves in Sheep’s clothing”, for they appear outwardly as Champions of Righteousness but inwardly they are Agents of Evil and Death.

 

 

 

 

 

A Rebuttal to Pete Buttigieg’s take on Freedom

 VS 

 

Pete Buttigieg is a Democratic candidate for the 2020 Presidential election.  Please watch this video of some remarks he made at a political rally in Greenville SC, March 23, 2019

 

 

A Rebuttal of Pete Buttigeig’s take on Freedom

Buttigeig’s comments from the video are in italic blue.  The Rebuttal is in bold red.

 

I don’t think we need different values.

 I believe in the values of this party, that’s why I’m doing this.

 It’s one of the reasons you always hear the word ‘freedom’ on my lips.

 We’ve allowed our conservative friends to get a monopoly on the idea of freedom.

 Now, they care about freedom, but they care about a very specific kind of freedom: freedom from.   

Not true.  We care about the Security of the Unalienable Rights of Mankind and we take issue with any idea or movement that would threaten them.    

Freedom from regulation, as though government were the only thing that could make us unfree.

Not from Regulations that Secure the Unalienable Rights of Mankind, particularly the Right to Life beginning at Conception.  The only Regulations that should be written are those which lead to the Security of the Unalienable Rights of Mankind; Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.  Every Regulation must protect the Unalienable Rights of Mankind without violating the Unalienable Rights of Mankind.    

But that’s not true, is it?

We know that your neighbor can make you unfree.  

Not legally.  My neighbor can’t legally confiscate my income and force me to pay for Programs of Dependency like the government can.

Your cable company can make you unfree.  

Not if you don’t have cable.  A cable company can’t take anything away from you without your consent, but the government can.

If they’re telling you who you ought to marry, your county clerk can make you unfree. 

Fail. The county clerk is a member of the government.  First Buttigeig criticizes the idea that only the government can make us unfree then he cites an example of the government making us unfree to support his claim.

You’re not free if you’re afraid to start a small business ‘cause leaving your job would mean losing your healthcare.

Healthcare shouldn’t be tied to your employer or the government precisely for such a reason.  It should be something you’re able to purchase on your own, outside of the government and outside of your employer, if and when you want it, and whenever you have the income to do so.  Your neighbors shouldn’t be forced to pay for your healthcare, and you shouldn’t be forced to pay for your neighbor’s; let Charity be voluntary.  He’s trying to make a case that people aren’t Free if there are Consequences to their actions.  Freedom does not equal No Consequences.   He’s trying to make his audience think Universal Healthcare provided by the government will make them free, but he doesn’t tell them that it will come at a great cost; that their incomes will be viciously raped and everything they’ve worked for will be confiscated and redistributed to those who do nothing.       

You’re not free if there is a veil of mistrust between you as a person of color and the officers who are sworn to keep you safe.

Buttigeig is simply pandering.  “Trust” and “Mistrust” are Emotions, and they are the result of an internal perspective, not an external fact.   He’s implying that the solution to “Mistrust” is external.  For example, I wouldn’t “trust” a grizzly bear because I’m intelligent and I know that he is a giant wild animal who is capable of killing me – but Buttigieg is suggesting that it’s the bear’s fault that I don’t trust him: he’s really implying that police officers shouldn’t focus on crime in “communities of color”.  By his logic, you’re not free if there is a veil of mistrust between you as a white person and the gang members of color you see while driving through the PUBLIC STREETS of Compton.   In other words, Buttigeig’s attempt to tie Freedom with Emotion this way is Intellectually Vapid.     

You’re not free if your reproductive choices are being dictated by male politicians in Washington.

No, rather, you’re not Free if you don’t have a Passionate Regard for the Sanctity of Human Life beginning at Conception.  Without a Passionate Regard for the Sanctity of Human Life beginning at Conception, you don’t have a Moral Compass.  In fact, without the Unalienable Right to be Alive from the time of your Conception you don’t have any Rights at all, Reproductive or otherwise.

So don’t let anybody tell you that the other side is the side that’s got a handle on freedom.

Real Freedom is the Ability to do what is Just and embrace what is True.   What prevents us from being able to do what is Just and embrace what is True?  Opinions, Obligations, Regulations, and Dependencies based on Lies, Errors, and a Callous Disregard for the Sanctity of Human Life!  These are the things which prevent us from being able to do what is Just and embrace what is True.  The Democratic Party does not have a handle on Freedom whatsoever; if you’re not a Proponent of the Unalienable Right to Life beginning at Conception, you’re not a Proponent of Human Rights at all.

We are the party of freedom, and we shouldn’t be afraid to go out there and say it.

There is no Real Freedom to be found in the policies and platform of the Democratic Party.  Every “Solution” they propose results in a System of Pets and Slaves and serves to promulgate the existence of a Totalitarian State where human beings are divided into First and Second Class citizens.   They have no Respect for the Unalienable Rights of Mankind.  Buttigieg’s claim is Laughable at best and Horrifying at worst.     

Thought for the Day (03-26-2019)

 

The Right to Liberty

A Human Being shall have the Right to Do everything that is Just and Believe everything that is True, so long as they Revere the Right to Life.  A Human Being shall Not be made to Tolerate the Suppression of Truth, nor be forced to Commit an Injustice.

Question: What prevents people from being able to do what is Just and believe what is True?

Answer: Opinions, Obligations, Regulations, and Dependencies based on Lies, Errors, and a Callous Disregard for the Sanctity of Human Life!  These are the things which prevent us from being able to do what is Just and believe what is True.

Freedom means being able to make Informed Decisions based on Facts.

Therefore (tongue-in-cheek), to combat the proliferation of Fake News and Propaganda, I call for Congress to implement a new Law through the FCC that requires all News Programs to display the following disclaimer before airing (like a WARNING label on a pack of cigarettes).

WARNING: Reports contained in this newscast may be fabricated, inaccurate, or deliberately misleading to facilitate a particular political agenda. 

I believe this is necessary since millions of American Voters depend upon the “News” to make informed decisions that affect the entire Country.

 

Talking Points (02-25-2019)

 

When THEY say

“Climate Change is Real and Genders are Fluid!”

WE say

“Genders are Real and Climate is Fluid!”

 

Human Beings are Heterosexual, there are only TWO Genders: Male and Female.  Males produce sperm.  Females produce eggs.  If Males produce sperm, and Females produce eggs, what would a third, fourth, or fifth Human Gender produce?  Would a third gender produce snorks, the fourth blumps, and the fifth winkerts?  Do snorks fertilize blumps – when a snork and a blump come together do they form a baby?  Human Beings cannot reproduce if they’re neither Male nor Female, if they produce neither sperm nor egg.  Only when a human sperm fertilizes a human egg does it form a Human Being.  There are no other Genders.

Then somebody says, “Well, it’s not a simple as that.”

But, Yes, it is exactly as simple as that.

 

The Earth’s Climate is Fluid, it has always been Fluid and it will always be Fluid.  To say that One Kind of Climate is better than another is PURE OPINION!  There are Pros and Cons to every type of Climate.  There will always be devastating Hurricanes, Tornados, Droughts, Floods, Blizzards, and Heatwaves no matter what.  The benefits of Warmer Climates, however, typically outweigh the benefits of Cooler Climates.  Human Beings, and all species in general, are more adapted to living in Warmer Climates.  If our planet became Warmer, Life would flourish!  A Warmer planet would definitely be a Good thing.  Never underestimate Nature’s ability to Adapt.

There is no Man-Made Climate Change Crisis!

 

FYI – Deserts exist because there is no water, not because it’s too hot.  The coldest place on Earth, Antarctica, is technically a desert.  If temperatures should rise, it doesn’t mean a desert will follow.

 

 

 

Talking Points (02-02-2019)

Are the 2020 Elections really going to be about Socialism versus Capitalism?

 

In Truth, there are no such things as Socialism and Capitalism.

Socialism is merely a euphemism, used by its proponents, for Totalitarianism.

Capitalism is merely an epithet, used by the proponents of Totalitarianism, for Freedom.

The debate between Socialism and Capitalism, therefore, is really a debate between Totalitarianism and Freedom.

 

Read these Articles:

The Hill: Democratic Socialism – philosophy of poverty

Proto Criteria: Talking Point (10-20-2018)

Proto Criteria: Capitalism

 

Intellectually arm yourself; never discuss Socialism and Capitalism without bringing up these salient points…

 

Under a Hivist System of Government such as Socialism or Fascism:

  • All Capital and Property is controlled or owned by the State.
  • All Economic Commerce and Consumption is planned and controlled by the State.
  • All Human Sustenance, such as Food, Shelter, Clothing, and Healthcare is provided by the State.
  • The Goal of Education is to Promulgate a Culture of Dependency.
  • All Communication Media are produced or controlled by the State and limited by Political Correctness.
  • Society is organized like an Insect Colony being divided into First and Second-Class Citizens (Leaders and Workers).

 

In a Free Society:

  • All Citizens have the Right to Own, Buy, Sell, and Leverage personal Property and Capital.
  • All Economic Commerce and Consumption is determined by Supply and Demand.
  • The acquisition of Food, Shelter, Clothing, and Healthcare is a direct function of the intensity of an Individual’s ingenuity, determination, and perseverance.
  • The Goal of Education is to Promulgate a Culture of Self-Reliance.
  • All Communication Media are Privately owned Enterprises and Endeavors exercising the Freedom of Speech.
  • Everyone is Free to Pursue an increase of their Wealth and Status in the Community

 

 

 

Thought for the Day (11-07-2018)

The Day After

Yesterday, all across the Nation, millions of American citizens split their votes between Republican and Democrat candidates.  For some reason, these particular citizens voted for a Democrat to represent them in the House then turned around and voted for a Republican to represent them in the Senate.

Why?  Why would they do that?

What were they hoping to accomplish?  Didn’t they know that by splitting their votes they were creating a Stalemate?

Did they deliberately want to create a Stalemate, or were they hoping their split would somehow force the two Parties to work together?

Of those two choices, the more appealing would be to say that they were trying to force the two Parties to work together because it “feels good” emotionally.  Since this last election was so contentious, splitting the vote could be compared to children asking their parents to stop fighting by giving one vote to mommy and the other vote to daddy.  Can’t we all just get along?  I’m sure that’s the way some will try to spin it.

I, on the other hand, don’t think that’s the case.  My capacity for Analysis won’t let me do that; I won’t take the easy way out.

I think we had the results that we had because a large portion of the electorate is actually Oblivious to the Vision each Party has for America.

And whose fault is that?